Year of Call:
Nathan Tavares specialises in clinical negligence, catastrophic personal injury claims, product liability, and professional negligence. He is regarded by solicitors and opponents interviewed by the legal directories for having “sound judgment”, “an industrious approach”, “a measured and independent perspective”, and “a good approachable manner”. He is noted to be “a versatile and quick-thinking communicator“. “He is very hard-working, conscientious and intellectually very strong.” “He is very good on the mechanics of an accident and he is very experienced on brain and spinal injury cases.”
Over recent years Nathan has acted in some of the highest value actions in his field, for example Collier v Norton where he represented a tetraplegic teenager whose claim is currently believed to be the largest approved settlement of its kind (in excess of £20 million – see the introduction to Facts & Figure 2016/17 for comment on this case). Also Williams v Brown with damages agreed in excess of £10 million.
Other areas of injury litigation in which Nathan has special expertise include travel law, aviation accidents (his first degree was in Aeronautical Engineering and he has acted in a number of claims with significant liability issues), claims involving the MoD, and industrial disease litigation. Nathan is an experienced horse rider and has acted predominantly for riding institutions in many horse-related claims. In the leading case of Mirvahedy v Henley he acted alone for the defendant at the quantum trial.
Nathan sits as a judge of the Mental Health Tribunal and is a contributor to, and on the Editorial Board of, the Journal of Personal Injury Law. Also, he is a joint author of the new Sweet & Maxwell practitioner text called ‘Brain Injury Claims ’.
Outside of work, Nathan is a keen sportsman. In November 2010 he ran the New York Marathon to raise money for the Spinal Injuries Association.
Nathan is a respected junior for complex or catastrophic personal injury claims. He has particular expertise in the following: traumatic brain injury; spinal cord injury; aviation accidents; equestrian accidents; and industrial disease claims.
He regularly appears against QCs and carries out both claimant and defendant work. Instructing solicitors include: Stewarts Law, Irwin Mitchell, Slater & Gordon, Withy King, Hodge Jones & Allen, Bird & Bird, Bevan Brittan, Clyde & Co., BLM, Weightmans, Bond Pearce, and Foot Anstey.
He has been involved in some of the largest individual personal injury claims including several with values in excess of £10 million and one in excess of £20 million, and a number of significant multi-party actions (mass tort claims).
Nathan often writes on personal injury topics and is an editor of the Journal of Personal Injury Law (Sweet & Maxwell).
Important cases include:
Freeman v Lockett  PIQR P.23
Represented Claimant in a leading case involving state funding of care issues for a claimant with tetraplegia.
Kotula v EDF Energy
Important claim with separate reported judgments dealing with (1) liability of cyclist using pavement rather than road, 15/6/10, Simon Brown QC; (2) provisional damages for syringomyelia,  EWHC 1546 QB, Irwin J.; (3) security of funding for periodical payments from a foreign insurer with an indemnity limit in euros, 9/11/12 Irwin J.
Edwards v London Borough of Sutton  EWHC 4378 (QB)
Claim for spinally injured individual concerning extent of occupier’s liability for historic structures (the claimant fell from a bridge with a low parapet wall whilst pushing a bicycle).
Soboloewska v Threlfall  EWHC 4219 (QB) (Foskett J)
Successfully claimed for a claimant who sustained a significant traumatic brain injury in a car park where the circumstantial evidence suggested she had been knocked down by the defendant’s car, though there were no independent witnesses and the claimant had no knowledge of what happened to her.
Bryant & Others v High Places Limited
Acted alone for claimants in a multi-party action arising out of a coach crash in Argentina. Recovered in excess of £900,000 for the claimants in various round table meetings.
Jebaraj v Esure Insurance, 10/12/15 QB, reported in Westlaw
Acting for a C1 tetraplegic claimant who sustained a spinal cord infarct 12 days after a mild whiplash injury. Liability and causation now established, quantum to be resolved.
Lear v Hickstead Limited  EWHC 528 QB
Acting alone for the first defendant sued under the OLA 1957 by a visitor to the Hickstead show who sustained paraplegia as a result of an accident on the site. Was successful in having the action dismissed.
Rankin & others v (1) MANX2 Ltd; (2) Flightline BCN; (3) Lineas Aereas de Andalucia; (4) La Reunion Aerienne
Acted for the first defendant (instructed by Bird & Bird on behalf of the French insurer) in relation to multiple claimants injured (some fatally) in an air crash that occurred in Cork in 2011. Quantum greater than £2 million.
Hickman, Cervi, Udoaka & others v (1) London Borough of Southwark, (2) London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority, (3) Apollo Property & Building Services Ltd
Acted for one of the defendants in a multi-party action arising out of the Lakanal House fire which was responsible for the deaths of six residents. Also acted for the contractor in a related professional negligence matter.
Nathan has a wide ranging clinical negligence practice with particular emphasis on claims involving spinal cord injury (from spinal surgery, spinal abscess or discitis), birth injuries, and claims arising out of psychiatric negligence. He is ranked as a leader in the filed in both Legal 500 and Chambers & Partners:
“He is as good with the numbers as he is on his feet in court.” “He always adds value to any case.” Legal 500, 2015
“He is very thorough, excellent on quantum and extremely bright.” “His client care is excellent. Nathan is super at quantum and very calm.” C&P 2015
Important cases include:
Barnett v Medway University Hospitals Trust  EWHC 440 (QB)
Acted for the claimant (led by Christopher Wilson-Smith QC) in spinal abscess case involving difficult causation issues. Lost at first instance after 7-day trial, but permission to appeal granted by the Court of Appeal – hearing due April 2016.
AB v Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust  EWHC 1024 QB
Successfully acting for claimant in action for delayed diagnosis of a spinal abscess leading to paraplegia. Quantum issues included interesting application of ex turpi causa as the claimant was a drug-abuser.
Hofer v The Bermuda Hospitals Board
Acting for claimant, a German national, who sustained tetraplegia when detained (whilst on holiday) by mental health services in Bermuda. The Hospital sought permission to appeal to the Privy Council in relation to a strike out application. I drafted the documents which were adopted by the Privy Council in refusing permission.
Szatmari -v- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
Acted for the claimant in a claim for delayed diagnosis of spinal abscess. The assessment of quantum has been complicated by pre-existing morbidity including pancreas transplant and uncontrolled diabetes.
Caton v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust
Acted for claimant in a hugely complex causation claim involving unexplained neurological symptoms following prolapsed disc and cauda equina syndrome. Numerous interlocutory hearings regarding failure by the defendant to make admissions.
Turnbull –v- South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
Instructed for the defendant hospital in a difficult claim arising out of an attempted suicide by a psychiatric patient. Interesting issues involving the duty owed to prevent an individual with a personality disorder from making self harm attempts when there is nothing that can be done to keep them completely safe, and when they need to be encouraged to take responsibility for their own actions.
Nathan has many years of experience in product liability claims involving personal injury. His expertise includes medical device litigation through to defective consumer products such as vehicles and machine tools. His instructions have been broadly balanced between claimants and defendants and many claims have involved a foreign element.
Nathan was retained for a number of years by a foreign consumer machine tool manufacturer (GMC Tools) in relation to all of the English product liability claims brought against it, of which there were numerous claims often with B&Q or Homebase co-defending.
Kadlec v ECM Limited & Lhor Industrie
Acted for defendant French-based manufacturer (instructed by Clyde & Co) of a car transporter in relation to a significant claim brought by a driver who sustained injury after the vehicle allegedly became uncontrollable and over-turned. There were many technical issues regarding the auto-stabilisation system of the vehicle. The claim was compromised.
Harding v Compact Tractors Ltd
Acted for spinally injured claimant for defectively designed and/or marketed small tractor which rolled and crushed the claimant. Instructed by Stewarts Law.
Harris v Collingwood & Kent High Performance Cars LLP
The claimant sustained tetraplegia after the Ferrari car he was test driving crashed. Nathan acted for the claimant who was suing his employer in relation to the defective vehicle and/or unsafe systems of work. Instructed by Stewarts Law.
Daborn v CT Staddon Limited
Product liability claim against supplier of a Rover MGF sports car for defective vehicle where the wheel disintegrated causing the claimant to suffer very severe injury. Claim settled. Instructed by Stones Solicitors.
Instructed by American manufacturer of mesh products in relation to multiple claims in England & Wales arising out of alleged defects in the products. Claims on-going.
Instructed by numerous claimants in metal on metal hip product liability claims predominantly involving De Puy devices, but also other manufacturers. Instructed by Leigh Day, Pryers, Foot Anstey, and Thompsons.
Instructed for claimant in a claim arising out of defective implanted cardiac defibrillator (ICD). Instructed by Leigh Day.
Nathan has considerable experience of claims from accidents abroad. He was recently instructed to advise an Australian insurance company and re-insurer on jurisdiction and choice of law issues in relation to an English woman seriously injured in an RTA in the New Territories. Another recent Australian case involved advising on security of funding of periodical payments in a personal injury action where the insurance was underwritten by the Government of Western Australia.
He is retained by a large multinational pharmaceutical company to represent it in English product liability claims and to advise it on jurisdictional issues.
Important cases include:
Qureshi v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Company
Acted for a British national very seriously injured in an RTA on the highway in Spain. The vehicle was registered in the UK, and the driver was an Indian man who was living in Morocco. Liability for the accident was disputed as the cause of loss of control of the vehicle was uncertain. Case settled for £1.5m + PPs of £370,000 per annum. Instructed by Stewarts Law
Rankine & Others v Manx2 Ltd & Others
Acted for Manx2, the airline responsible for a crash at Cork Airport in February 2011, in respect of two fatal accident claims and one personal injury claim. The claims involved the Warsaw and Montreal Convention, and there were jurisdictional issues as well as significant quantum issues. Instructed by Bird & Bird.
Menendez v Metal Processing Limited
Acting for a Spanish national who was injured in an accident whilst at work in England. During the accident both hands were traumatically amputated. There are no jurisdictional issues, but there are issues regarding assessment of quantum and application of multipliers for someone residing in Spain. Instructed by Coles Miller.
Bryant and Others v High Places Limited
Acted for three claimants who were seriously injured in a coach crash in Argentina after returning from a walking expedition in Patagonia.
Wetherall v Gan Assurances IARD
Acting for a member of the RAF who was knocked off his bicycle and seriously injured whilst on a charity cycle ride in southern France. The car which hit him was being driven by French national. There are on-going issues regarding quantification of the damages under French law.
Appointments & Memberships
- Professional Negligence Bar Association
- Personal Injury Bar Association
- Pan European Organisation of Personal Injury Lawyers
- Product Liability Forum
Areas of Law
- Clinical Negligence
- Product Liability
- Court of Protection
- Health, Safety & Environment
- Law In Sport
- Personal Injury
- International Illness, Injury & Travel
- Professional Negligence
- Public Law
- Mental Health
“Undoubtedly one of the brightest juniors at the personal injury Bar.” Personal Injury, Legal 500 2017
“He has impressive knowledge of the law and good judgement.” Clinical Negligence, Legal 500 2017
“He’s got real gravitas and is clearly a silk in the making. He’s a real technician, a real brain.” Personal Injury, Chambers & Partners 2017
“He’s approachable, thorough and detailed. He gives good, in-depth advice on how to pursue a claim.” Personal Injury, Chambers & Partners 2017
“He has a lightning-fast grasp of issues and is always ready to assist.” Clinical Negligence, Chambers & Partners 2017
“He is industrious and a very capable advocate.” Legal 500 2016
“He is very thorough, excellent on quantum and extremely bright.” Clinical Negligence, Chambers & Partners 2016
“His client care is excellent. Nathan is super at quantum and very calm.” Clinical Negligence, Chambers & Partners 2016
“He is very hard-working, conscientious and intellectually very strong.” Personal Injury, Chambers & Partners 2016
“He is very good on the mechanics of an accident and he is very experienced on brain and spinal injury cases.” Personal Injury, Chambers & Partners 2016
“He is a very methodical and incredibly hard-working advocate. Very good with clients, he’s excellent at fielding questions.” Clinical Negligence, Chambers & Partners 2015
“His judgement is sound, he is hard-working, has a good brain and is a safe pair of hands.” “He is a pleasure to work with as he is very good with clients and excellent at analysing medical reports and numbers.” Personal Injury, Chambers & Partners 2015
“He is as good with the numbers as he is on his feet in court.” Clinical Negligence, Legal 500 2015
“He always adds value to any case.” Personal Injury, Legal 500 2015
“He’s good forensically and on technical points.” “He’s brave – he stands his ground and has the courage of his convictions.” Personal Injury, Chambers & Partners 2014
“He has a wealth of experience, together with a solid work ethic that gets results.” Clinical Negligence, Legal 500 2014
“Excellent at case preparation.” Personal Injury, Legal 500 2014
“A well-respected claimant junior working on the highest value cases,” who is appreciated by legal teams for his no-nonsense approach to issues. His practice consists of a mix of spinal cord and brain injury work and he “never fails to add value to a case.” Personal Injury, Chambers & Partners 2013
Nathan Tavares is praised as a “versatile and quick-thinking communicator.” Tavares handles a wide range of severe brain injury cases and has a particular grasp of claims with a psychiatric element. Personal Injury, Chambers & Partners 2012
Nathan Tavares, is “destined to take silk.” Personal Injury, Chambers & Partners 2012
The “talented” Nathan Tavares is a sound choice for high-value brain and spinal injury cases, and is noted for his particular expertise on cases involving military and aviation aspects. Solicitors rate him for his “industrious approach, measured advice and independent perspective.” Personal Injury, Chambers & Partners 2011
Nathan Tavares, for his ability to “tackle difficult issues head on.” Clinical Negligence, Legal 500 2011
Nathan Tavares, is “destined for silk”. Personal Injury, Legal 500 2011
“Nathan Tavares has built his reputation on having “sound judgment and a good, approachable manner”. A good choice for managing difficult clients, he represents both claimants and defendants. His expertise covers many bases, including equestrian and aviation claims, as well as cases with a mental health element.” Personal Injury, Chambers & Partners 2010
“Nathan Tavares judgement is invariably sound.” Personal Injury, Legal 500 2010