Andrew Short KC’s practice centres on pensions, employment, and general commercial work.
His “practical” and “realistic” approach together with his “great understanding of the commercial issues in a case” makes his strategic advice and his advocacy highly sought after by his clients, whether they are national or international companies or organisations, public bodies, trustees, trade unions or individuals.
He is able to bring years of experience as a trial lawyer in hostile and contentious claims to bear whenever necessary. He has been recommended for Pensions and for Employment in both Legal 500 and Chambers & Partners for many years.
Andrew has lectured on pensions, discrimination and employment issues and is on the Consultation Board of Practical Law: Pensions.
Andrew’s employment practice covers everything from complex or sensitive dismissal and discrimination cases through TUPE to high value contract, restrictive covenant, fiduciary duty and equal pay claims. He has acted in many of the leading cases relating to discrimination in pay and pensions, including Abdulla v Birmingham City Council, Brierley v Asda, McCloud v Lord Chancellor, and Sargeant v LFEPA.
Recent work includes:
Sainsbury’s Supermarkets v Clark [2023] EWCA Civ 386
Early conciliation, group claims and rejection.
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Beattie [2022] UKEAT 163
Age discrimination, Brexit, the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018 and the PPF
Johnson v Transopco [2022] EAT 6
Worker status
Clark v Sainsburys Supermarket [2022] EAT 143
Early Conciliation and multiple claims.
Asda Stores v Brierley [2021] UKSC 10
Comparability: use of comparators at different establishments under the same employment and single source tests.
London Fire Commissioner v Sargeant [2021] UKEAT 0137
Age discrimination and the non-discrimination rule.
McCloud v Lord Chancellor; Sargeant v LFEPA [2018] EWCA Civ 2844
Direct age discrimination and pensions; objective justification; equal pay.
Parker v MDU [2017] UKEAT/0113/17/DA
Equal pay, part-time workers, indirect discrimination, material factor and objective justification.
Birmingham City Council v Abdulla [2012] UKSC 47
Landmark decision of Supreme Court as to the jurisdiction of High Court and County Court in relation to Equal Pay Claims.
British Airways v Williams [2012] UKSC 43
Construction of UK regulations in context of EC Directive. Referred to ECJ.
Andrew has experience of large financial services and other commercial disputes. Recent matters include:
McGaughey & Davies v USS Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 873
Common law derivative claim, valuations, trustee duties, indirect discrimination, costs and expenses, fossil fuels and ESG
Mengiste v Endowment Fund for the Rehabilitation of Tigray [2017] EWCA Civ 1326
Conflict of laws, forum non conveniens, refusal to lift a stay, fraud.
Andrew’s pensions work encompasses both private and public sector schemes and includes issues of construction, funding issues, preservation and revaluation, Beckmann claims and various regulatory issues including contribution notices and financial support directions. He is particularly sought after in cases that require a knowledge of both pensions and employment or discrimination law, including some of the most significant equalisation cases of recent years. In addition to his advisory work, recent contentious work includes cases involving:
McGaughey & Davies v USS Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 873
Common law derivative claim, valuations, trustee duties, indirect discrimination, costs and expenses, fossil fuels and ESG
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Beattie [2022] UKEAT 163
Age discrimination, Brexit, the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018 and the PPF
CMG Pension Trustees v CGI IT UK Limited
Forfeiture clauses, construction and the archaeology of a scheme, recoupment, section 91(6) of the Pensions Act 1995 and the status of the Pensions Ombudsman
In the matter of the Axminster Carpets Group Retirement Benefits Plan [2021] EWHC 1652 (Ch)
Forfeiture, construction, exercise of discretion by trustees, interest, Re Benjamin orders, limitation, section 37 Pension Schemes Act 1993.
Britvic PLC v Britvic Pensions Ltd & Mohun [2021] EWCA Civ 867
Construction of a pension increases rule.
Lloyds Banking Group Pensions Trustees Limited v Lloyds Bank & Others [2020] EWHC 3135 (Ch)
GMP Equalisation, transfer payments, limitation.
Safeway Ltd v Newton & Anor [2020] EWCA Civ 869
Equalisation, levelling down, the equal treatment rule.
Safeway Ltd v Newton & Anor C-171/18 [2020] ICR 673, CJEU
Equalisation, levelling down, the equal treatment rule.
McCloud v Lord Chancellor; Sargeant v LFEPA [2018] EWCA Civ 2844
Direct age discrimination and pensions; objective justification; equal pay.
Lloyds Banking Group Pensions Trustees v Lloyds Bank [2018] EWHC 2839 (Ch)
GMP equalisation, forfeiture clauses, limitation.
G4S Plc v G4S Trustees Ltd [2018] EWHC 1749 (Ch)
Closure to accrual, the final salary link, when is a scheme frozen for the purposes of the Employer Debt Regulations.
Burgess & Ors v BIC UK Ltd [2018] EWHC 785 (Ch)
Retrospectivity: the effectiveness of a retrospective effective date in a definitive deed; equitable recoupment, limitation, the need for a Court order and the status of the Pensions Ombudsman.
Safeway v Newton [2017] EWCA Civ 1482
Retrospectivity: levelling down and EU law.
IBM v Dalgleish [2015] EWHC 389 (Ch)
Remedies hearing covering many issues, including interplay between redundancy and retirement.
Vaitkus v Dresser-Rand UK [2014] EWHC 170 (Ch) In the [2014] 021 PBLR (018)
Construction of the governing provisions of a pension scheme; equalisation.
Pell Frischmann v Prabhu & Lamb [2013] EWHC 2203 (Ch)
Access to Pensions Ombudsman; prospective costs.
ICM Computer Group v Stribley [2013] EWHC 2995 (Ch)
Construction of the governing provisions of a pension scheme; corrective construction and omissions.
Urenco UK Ltd v Urenco UK Pension Trustee Co Ltd & Mossop [2012] EWHC 1495 (Ch)
Statutory pension protection following a transfer in the nuclear industry.
Woodcock v Cumbria Primary Care Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 330
Age discrimination, entitlement to early retirement benefits, justification: avoidance of wind-fall and cost.
Andrew undertakes professional negligence work, often though not always related to employment or occupational pension schemes.
Andrew Short KC is regulated by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) and holds a current practising certificate. If you are not satisfied with the service provided, please click here.
To find out more, contact Nick Levett +44 (0)20 7427 4908 or Mark Gardner +44 (0)20 7427 4909 for a confidential discussion.
Our dedicated practice management team can help you identify the right barrister for your case.
Read Andrew’s Privacy Policy.