Michael Uberoi

Year of Call:
2004
Direct Access:
Yes

Michael Uberoi practises in commercial and regulatory litigation, with a particular focus upon pensions and financial services. He is recommended as a Leading Junior by the legal directories in both Pensions and Financial Services.

Michael’s ongoing work includes pension litigation (such as rectification and indexation work) professional negligence matters (involving solicitors, actuaries, and administrators), commercial disputes involving allegations of fraud and breaches of COBS, and regulatory work engaging all aspects of the FCA Handbook (for both Defendants, and the Regulators). He has ongoing matters involving the Pensions Regulator, the Financial Conduct Authority, the Pension Protection Fund, and Lloyd’s of London.

The 2023 legal directories say “Michael is a superstar – he’s got incredible judgement and is very knowledgeable about some of the more difficult areas of pensions” (Pensions, Chambers & Partners, 2023) and that he “knows the subject area inside out” (Pensions, Chambers & Partners, 2023). In Financial Services, he is described as “personable, technically outstanding, and very hard working and responsive” (Financial Services Regulation, Legal 500, Leading Junior). The 2024 Directories also describe him as “an exceptional advocate”, who is “very dynamic and bright” and who is “very well prepared and an extremely effective advocate.”

Michael is a member of COMBAR and the Chancery Bar Association. He is also called to the Bar of Northern Ireland.

Some examples of current or very recent work include:

  • Richard Tomlin v The Council of Lloyd’s of London – Acting for the Defendant Richard Tomlin (a leading underwriter) in enforcement proceedings brought by Lloyd’s of London, in which the regulator argued for a lifetime ban and a multi-million pound fine for alleged non-financial misconduct. Michael’s client was acquitted of (all) 37 charges. Reported in the ‘Insurance Insider’ Article 1 & Article 2 and in ‘The Insurer’. 
  • Acting for the professional trustee in a four day trial before the Chancery Division of the High Court in a case involving disputed pension increases granted by directors / trustees, to themselves (Fetherston & Ors v Dalriada);
  • Acting for the trustees in the rectification of a scheme arising out of incorrect pension increase rules (Viavi Solutions UK Limited v Viavi Pension Trustee UK Limited [2022] EWHC 2565 (Ch)), and for the company and trustee in successful rectification proceedings in 2024 (St Modwen Property plc v Smith);
  • Acting for the Target in a 4 day Pension Regulator Contribution Notice hearing involving the Regulator’s moral hazard powers;
  • Acting for the Defendant in proceedings before the Upper Tribunal, arising out of transfers out of the British Steel Pension Scheme (pension liberation);
  • Acting for the successful scheme member in a fully contested oral hearing before the Pensions Ombudsman, in which findings of dishonesty were made against the Respondent professional trustee, as a result of a failure to manage conflicts of interest (PO-22369, re the Allen, Allen & Ms E SSAS pension scheme, publication date December 2022).

Expertise

Michael is a leading pensions junior ranked in both Chambers & Partners, and Legal 500. The 2023 editions describe him as “a superstar” who has “incredible judgment”, and say that “his arguments are precise and well considered, delivered in an accessible manner”.

Michael has been instructed in some of the most significant pensions litigation in recent years. Some examples of recent cases include:

Notable Pensions & Trusts cases


Univar v Smith & Ors [2020] EWHC 1596 (Ch)

(involving rectification, and extrinsic / South West Trains contracts – the case is now the leading authority on pension scheme rectification) – As stated in the recent case of Iggesund [2021], the principles of pension scheme rectification were “settled” by Univar, which case it is “unnecessary to look beyond.”

Safeway Ltd v Newton (Cases 1 and 2 in the Court of Appeal, and in the CJEU- [2020] EWCA Civ 869; [2017] EWCA Civ 1482) (led by Andrew Short QC).

Safeway was the highest value equalisation claim ever to come before the courts, and is one of the most high profile claims involving discrimination in pension schemes in recent years, as well as (Briggs LJ, in the Court of Appeal) representing one of the leading authorities on the correct approach to the construction of pension scheme documentation. Michael acted for the Representative Beneficiary and was successful at both first instance, in the Court of Appeal, and before the CJEU.

Viavi Solutions UK Limited v Viavi Pension Trustee UK Limited [2022] EWHC 2565 (Ch)

Michael acted for the pension trustee in these rectification proceedings arising out of faulty indexation rules; and for the company and trustee in successful rectification proceedings in 2024 (St Modwen Property plc v Smith).

Fetherston v Dalriada (judgment awaited)

A  five day High Court trial involving contested historic pension increases (and a change of accrual rate), dating back to alleged decisions in the mid 1970’s. The Scheme is in the PPF assessment period and the case involves issues arising from the PPF’s statutory Admissible Rules, and associated legislation, as well as exercise of powers, extrinsic contract, and estoppel.

PO-22369, re the Allen, Allen & Ms E SSAS, publication date December 2022

Acting for the successful Complainant in a fully contested oral hearing before the Pensions Ombudsman, in which findings of dishonesty were made against the Respondent professional trustee and member trustees, as a result of their failure to manage conflicts of interest, with the consequence that the scheme’s exoneration clauses could not be relied upon by the Respondents in relation to significant unauthorised payment tax charges.

Sheffield v Kier Group plc [2019] EWHC 986 (Ch))

A High Court appeal involving the extent of the Pensions Ombudsman’s jurisdiction, and legitimate expectations / A1P1 rights.

Various ongoing professional negligence proceedings, including:

  • Acting for the trustee in negligence proceedings against solicitors arising from failing to spot that an adjacent rule was impacted by a faulty principal rule, notwithstanding the rectification of the adjacent rule in previous court proceedings;
  • Acting for a Claimant company in professional negligence proceedings against a magic circle law firm for failing to properly ensure that the scheme’s indexation and revaluation rules converted from RPI to CPI (and related loss of a chance arguments in the aftermath of those failings);
  • Acting for the Defendant (a well-known firm of actuaries) in defence of proceedings brought alleging professional negligence during its appointment as Scheme Actuary of a well-known scheme, as a result of (for example) failing to spot faulty drafting, and failing to provide section 37 certificates of actuarial confirmation;
  • Acting for the Defendant (actuaries and administrators) in proceedings alleging a failure to warn about deficiently drafted equalisation rules (successfully argued the true loss was caused by the later actions of the trustees when red-circling a cohort of members).

Representing the Target in an 2023 hearing before the Pensions Regulator, arising out of a contested Contribution Notice in relation to the material detriment test.

Acting for individual trustees and former directors in Part 7 restitutionary proceedings brought regarding the Bic UK Pension Scheme, which claim alleged conflicts of interest and breach of company articles in the awarding of future benefit entitlements.

Representing the Target trustees in a hearing before the Upper Tribunal brought by the Pensions Regulator, at which Prohibition Orders were sought in the aftermath of a pensions liberation scandal.

Advising the employer in connection with a s.75 employer debt under the Employer Debt Regulations, and associated employment cessation events; and

Instructed by the Pensions Regulator in proceedings before the Upper Tribunal in relation to high value breaches of the employer related investments legislation, by a senior trustee.

Michael frequently advises on matters before the Pensions Ombudsman, and on appeals from determinations of the Ombudsman (including in cross-over appeals from determinations of the Financial Ombudsman Service, in relation to pension misselling) -see the Allen, Allen and Ms E SSAS scheme case above (PO-22369), and Sheffield v Kier Group Plc [2019] EWHC 986 (Ch) (also above).

Michael has a large amount of experience advising in relation to the LGPS (interpretation of Transfer Agreements, Admission Agreements, and the true construction of the Regulations themselves), and other major public sector schemes (he has advised upon, among others, the Armed Forces, Police, and Teachers Pension schemes).

Michael’s practice often covers the regulatory and civil aspects of financial services law, in which areas Michael is particularly well placed to advise having previously undertaken a secondment to the Financial Conduct Authority. Of his Financial Services work, the current directories state that “Michael is very willing to get stuck into the matter right away and offers a pragmatic, commercial steer backed up by careful analysis of his lay client’s circumstances” (Legal 500, Financial Services Regulation, 2023) and that he is: ““personable, technically outstanding, and very hard working and responsive” (Legal 500, FS Regulation).

Much of Michael’s work in this field is confidential, however some recent or ongoing instructions include:

  • various ongoing pieces of commercial litigation involving alleged breach of COBS duties, often with regard to wealth management entities,
  • acting for an investment fund manager in a dispute involving alleged breaches of several of the SMR Conduct Rules and the fit and proper person test;
  • acting for an IFA in proceedings before the Regulatory Decisions Committee of the FCA, arising out of advice given in the context of transfers out of the British Steel pension scheme;
  • advising the CEO of a major wealth management firm with regard to his Senior Management Function responsibilities in the context of CASS breaches by the firm, and FCA whistleblowing;
  • advising a large trading entity in relation to financial promotions, and whether there was a breach of s.21 FSMA in the context of the (Financial Promotions) Order 2005;
  • advising the board of a major lending entity with regard to potential breaches of the Regulated Activities Order, and upon whether underlying loan agreements were consequently unenforceable under s. 28 FSMA;
  • advising a major private wealth management firm in relation to an ongoing investigation by the regulator with regard to advice given upon client transfers out of DB schemes and into SIPPS, and alleged breaches of COBS;
  • advising a major mortgage credit business on perimeter questions.

Michael is a contributing author to the publication Encyclopaedia of Forms and Precedents (Financial Services), published by Lexis Nexis, and a previous contributing author to Lissack & Horlick on Bribery.

Michael is an experienced regulatory advocate who frequently appears on behalf of professional individuals and regulated entities. He is described in the legal directories as “an esteemed barrister who excels at representing financial professionals in proceedings before regulators, including the FRC and Pensions Regulator” (Chambers & Partners 2023, Professional Discipline) and as “Approachable and easy to work with, but also unflappable and tenacious. Highly recommended.” (Chambers & Partners).

Notable Disciplinary & Regulatory cases


Richard Tomlin v The Council of Lloyd’s of London

Acting for the Defendant Richard Tomlin (a leading underwriter) in enforcement proceedings brought by Lloyd’s of London, in which the Lloyd’s regulator requests a lifetime ban and a multi-million pound fine, as a result of alleged non-financial misconduct whilst working within the Lloyd’s market. Reported in the ‘Insider Insurer’; Article 1, Article 2 and in ‘The Insurer‘.

Instructed by the Pensions Regulator in proceedings against a senior trustee in relation to high value breaches of the restrictions upon employer related investments.

Acting for an IFA in proceedings before the Regulatory Decisions Committee of the FCA, arising out of advice given in the context of transfers out of the British Steel pension scheme.

Acting for a trustee and accountant during an investigation brought by the Financial Reporting Council, arising out of the Pension Regulator’s investigations into the Coats Pension Plan / Guinness Peat Group.

Acting for the Target trustees in response to proceedings brought by the Pensions Regulator at a hearing before the Determinations Panel, at which hearing Prohibition Orders were sought to prevent the Targets from acting as trustees.

Acting for the Target in a disputed Contribution Notice hearing before the Pensions Regulator, in the context of the material detriment test (4 day hearing).

Michael regularly acts in commercial disputes, with much of his recent work in this area having settled confidentially. Some recent or ongoing cases include:

Notable Chancery & Commercial cases


Defending a financial advisory firm and leading wealth management entity in relation to an alleged failure to transfer a defined benefit pension (misrepresentation, breach of COBS).

Acting in a lengthy Chancery Division trial for a defendant accused of various breaches of a freezing order as a result of share movements to the BVI (Barclays Bank v Mason [2024] EWHC 1994 (Ch)).

Acting for a leading supply chain entity in a multi-million pound dispute involving national milk haulage and the terms for its delivery (Commercial List, Michael successfully resisted injunctive proceedings at the outset of the dispute).

Ceredigion Recycling & Furniture Team v (1) Pope (2) Cann & Ors [2022] EWHC 1969 (Ch) – appearing for the second defendant director during the recovery proceedings arising from a trial alleging disputed pension payments.

Acting for the defendant building contractor (and its director) in proceedings alleging fraudulent misrepresentation and breach of contract arising out of several years of invoiced sub-contractor work for a major building project in East London.

Obtaining a freezing injunction (in the sum of approximately £3 million) and acting in the underlying breach of loan agreement claim, on behalf of an Indian marketing firm. The case settled for its full value shortly after the freezing injunction was obtained.

Acting for a Dubai based trading entity in its claim for breach of contract and misrepresentation over the contractual terms applicable to a foreign exchange trading account, and a related decision to close out positions resulting in a multi-million pound loss for the Claimant (breach of contract / misrepresentation).

Acting for a major hotel food supplier in defending a high value claim involving the Commercial Agency Regulations and their disputed applicability to various commercial relationships with employees, fraudulent misrepresentation and deceit.

A claim for a holiday letting company against a major bank for breach of contract, misrepresentation, and failure to exercise a contractual lending discretion in a loan agreement in good faith, which settled in the claimant’s favour for a sum of approximately £2.5 million.

Related updates

Michael Uberoi is regulated by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) and holds a current practising certificate. If you are not satisfied with the service provided, please click here.

"He is a pleasure to work with."; "Michael really knows his stuff when it comes to pensions and financial services matters."; "He provides strong, consistent advice."; "Michael is a pleasure to work with."

Financial Services, Chambers & Partners 2025

‘An excellent all rounder.’

Pensions, Legal 500 2025

"Michael is approachable and commercial, providing really high-quality legal advice but in a practical way that has helped us on a number of occasions navigate very difficult issues."; "A pleasure to work with, Michael provided strong, consistent advice in a timely manner and on budget."; "Michael has a very clear level of expertise and sophistication in both written and oral tasks."

Pensions, Chambers & Partners 2025

"Michael is very willing to get stuck into the matter right away and offers a pragmatic, commercial steer backed up by careful analysis of his lay client’s circumstances."

Financial Services Regulation, Legal 500 2023

"Michael is technically brilliant but also a pleasure to work with, and clients love him."; "Clients love his calm and easygoing manner. The perfect person for tricky issues that are likely to have dire consequences."; "Michael is a first-rate barrister who blends legal skills with a great client-focused approach."

Pensions, Chambers & Partners 2024

"A really strong senior junior. He's very calm and measured, gets to grips with complicated legal issues quickly, and is great on his feet."; "Very well prepared and an extremely effective advocate."

Professional Discipline, Chambers & Partners 2024

"Michael understands the needs of an individual client and is empathetic while providing sensible, robust legal advice in a lay-friendly manner."; “Excels at representing financial professionals in proceedings before regulators, including the FRC and Pensions Regulator”

Professional Discipline, Chambers & Partners 2025

'Hard-working and bright, gaining an excellent reputation.'

Pensions, Legal 500, 2024

“Michael knows the subject area inside out. His advice is clear, commercially focused and delivered in a client-friendly manner. Also, he is always great to use as a sounding board.”

Pensions, Chambers and Partners 2023

“He's extremely competent and pragmatic. Michael is generous with his time and has a good manner with clients.”

Pensions, Chambers and Partners 2023

“Michael is a superstar - he's got incredible judgement and is very knowledgeable about some of the more difficult areas of pensions.”

Pensions, Chambers and Partners 2023

“Michael has been a pleasure to deal with; he is responsive and his work product is very good.”

Professional Discipline, Chambers and Partners 2023

"He is extremely personable and explains complex concepts very simply to clients. Great bedside manner. His arguments are precise and well considered, delivered in an accessible manner."

Pensions, Legal 500 2023

"Michael is an absolute delight to work with. He is not only technically outstanding, he is also incredibly hardworking and is brilliant with clients."

Pensions, Legal 500 2022

"Michael is very personable, and his approach to work is excellent; thorough, comprehensive, practical, and timely."

Financial services regulation, Legal 500 2022

"He has very thorough and well-founded knowledge, and he is very practical and very client-friendly."

Pensions, Chambers and Partners 2021

"Very dynamic and bright"

Chambers and Partners 2021

"He is very commercially minded and knows the pensions practice area."

Pensions, Chambers and Partners 2021

"He is able to get to grips with technical issues and provide clear advice quickly."

Pensions, Chambers and Partners 2021

"Excellent senior junior who invests time to understand and address client concerns."

Pensions, Legal 500 2021

"Michael is personable, technically outstanding, and very hard working and responsive."

Financial Services Regulation, Legal 500 2021

"His written and oral advocacy is clear and persuasive and he is a pleasure to work with."

Pensions, Legal 500 2020

"A very talented barrister who has a keen eye for detail."

Financial Services Regulation, Legal 500 2020

"Approachable and easy to work with." "An excellent senior junior."

Chambers & Partners 2019

"Very likeable and very good on his feet."

Chambers & Partners 2018

"He puts clients at ease, and is well prepared and easy to get on with."

Chambers & Partners 2018

"Exceptionally skilled in communicating with clients."

Legal 500 2017

"An exceptional advocate, who is doggedly determined to ensure fairness for his client."

Legal 500 2017

"Exceptionally good. Very, very hard-working, incredibly incise, lots of panache and confidence. A really good advocate."

Chambers & Partners 2017

"Highly thought of junior who represents professionals before the FCA Enforcement Division. Analytical, calmly persuasive and thorough; when you send him papers, you know he’ll have read, analysed and carefully prepared every aspect of the case."

Chambers & Partners 2017

Michael is a very impressive junior barrister who is knowledgeable and accomplished beyond his years. He is sensible, realistic and pragmatic in his advice, whilst his care in presenting a case is notable.

Chambers & Partners 2017

"A great team player, who takes a sensible, pragmatic approach."

Legal 500 2016

"An excellent junior, who punches above his weight."

Legal 500 2016

He adopts a firm but calm approach, and clearly sets out the reality of a case to clients. He is extremely well prepared for all his cases and employs imaginative arguments on behalf of his client to achieve the best results possible." "He is knowledgeable and accomplished beyond his years.

Chambers & Partners 2016

A good advocate who comes over very well." "He is extremely hard-working, highly approachable and a good communicator.

Chambers & Partners 2016

"A bright junior with a strong intellect and good judgement; he will go far."

Legal 500 2016

"He did an extremely good job in difficult circumstances."

Chambers & Partners 2015

"He is already very good and in five years will be a major name in the field."

Chambers & Partners 2014

"Michael Uberoi appears regularly in public inquiries. [He] recently advised the former Director General of the BBC in connection with his appearance before the Pollard Inquiry."

Chambers & Partners 2014

Michael Uberoi "Also tackles sports-related cases…[he] has a growing practice in this field and is building a solid reputation amongst his peers."

Chambers & Partners 2014

"Knowledgeable beyond his years."

Legal 500 2014

"Michael Uberoi is making a name for himself."

Chambers & Partners 2013

To find out more, contact Matt Sale on +44 (0)20 7427 4910 or Lexie Johnson on + 44 (0) 207 427 0801 for a confidential discussion.

Our dedicated practice management team can help you identify the right barrister for your case.

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)