Year of Call:
Naomi Ling is a specialist in employment law and pensions law. She is recognised for her expertise and experience in both fields, particularly in areas where there is overlap between the two disciplines. She is especially rated for her strong client skills, excellent judgment and meticulous preparation.
In employment law, Naomi represents both employers and employees across the full spectrum of employment law issues. She is regularly in the Employment tribunal, Employment Appeal Tribunal, County Court and High Court, and has appeared both led and unled in the Court of Appeal.
Recent cases of note include an instruction as specialist pensions counsel for the government in the 2019 Rail Franchising litigation brought by Stagecoach and others against the Department of Transport. Naomi is also currently acting for over 200 judges in their claims of age, sex and race discrimination in the landmark case of McCloud v Ministry of Justice  IRLR 477 in which she and Andrew Short QC were successful in the Court of Appeal in 2019 and which remedy is now being determined. Naomi was also successful in the EAT in the case of Page v Lord Chancellor and Chief Justice UKEAT/0304/18/LA which is now under appeal to the Court of Appeal and which is due to be heard later this year.
In pensions law, Naomi acts for employers, trustees, employees and statutory authorities on a range of different issues. Her caseload includes claims for professional negligence arising out of failed amendments to pension schemes, claims for rectification of pension trust deeds and rules, claims relating to the construction of trust documentation, statutory provisions and employment contracts, and numerous claims relating to individual entitlements. She has a particular interest in public sector schemes and issues and is a member of the Association of Pension Lawyers’ Public Sector sub-committee.
Naomi was appointed to the A Panel of the Attorney General’s Counsel to the Crown in 2020 after completing a seat on the B Panel. She undertakes public law work in her areas of specialism.
Employment & Discrimination
Naomi is an experienced employment law practitioner with a busy advocacy and advisory practice. She appears regularly for both claimants and respondents including NHS Trusts, government departments, financial institutions, charities, and retail organisations.
Her claimant work includes a strong strain of trade union related work and she has appeared before the Central Arbitration Committee.
Representing the claimant, general counsel of an international architectural practice, in her claim for detriment and dismissal on the grounds of public interest disclosures, in a preliminary hearing to determine whether her disclosures amounted to protected disclosures. The issues included whether and in what circumstances statements that are themselves privileged could amount to protected disclosures, and therefore what kind of protection the whistleblowing provisions offer to in-house lawyers.
Page v Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice UKEAT/0304/18/LA
Successfully represented the Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice, unled, in an appeal from the employment tribunal by the claimant. The claimant claimed he had been victimised and his Article 10 rights breached when he was removed following the magistracy following an appearance on breakfast TV in which he stated that he believed that it was most natural for children to be adopted by a man and a woman.
Media coverage can be read here.
Corsham v Essex Police and Crime Commissioner  EWHC 1776
Represented the claimants, unled, in a claim in the High Court on appeal from the Pensions Ombudsman for negligent misstatement and breach of the Scally implied term. The Claimants had had a protected pension age of below 55 but this was lost when they were re-employed within a month of retirement, resulting in huge personal tax liabilities. The High Court found that the pensions administrators should have known about the relevant tax rules and had misled the claimants as to the true implications of re-employment.
Acetrip v Dogra UKEATPA/0329/18/BA
Represented the appellant in an application to extend time for appealing to the EAT. An extension would have been granted for failing to appreciate the time limit of 16.00pm given the appellant’s family circumstances but not for the failure to attach the ET1 and ET3 to the application.
Instructed in equal pay claim against Morrisons
Instructed in a large group litigation claim for equal pay against the supermarket chain Morrisons, led by Andrew Short QC.
Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v Crawford  EWCA Civ 269
Represented the claimant, unled, in this appeal to the Court of Appeal about the definition of ‘compensatory rest break’ of twenty minutes and whether it was acceptable to provide it in multiple discontinuous chunks.
McCloud v Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice  IRLR 477
Successful before the Court of Appeal in this challenge to the legality of the transitional protection afforded pursuant to the Public Sector Pensions Act 2013. The Court of Appeal held that the decision to protect those within ten years of retirement was ‘irrational’. Led by Andrew Short QC.
Successfully represented the Claimant in a claim for unfair dismissal for having failed a drugs test. The case received some attention in the general and legal press, which can be read here.
Appointments & Memberships
- Association of Pension Lawyers
- Discrimination Law Association
- Employment Law Bar Association
- Employment Law Association
- Industrial Law Society
Naomi Ling is regulated by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) and holds a current practising certificate. If you are not satisfied with the service provided, please click here.
Areas of Law
“Bright, pragmatic and a joy to work with.” Pensions, Chambers & Partners 2019
“A very good junior who provides clear advice. She is also responsive and helpful.” Employment, Chambers & Partners 2019
“She receives praise for her public sector pensions knowledge.” Pensions, Legal 500 2019
“She is highly intelligent and works relentlessly for her clients.” Employment, Legal 500 2019
“Really easy to deal with. She is responsive and turns things around quickly.” Employment, Chambers & Partners 2018
“Very thorough, very hard-working and very effective in tribunal.” Employment, Chambers & Partners 2018
“She is well organised and thoughtful in both a technical and strategic sense. She has an ability to appreciate the ultimate client concerns and seeks to address those sensitively, while also making sure that the right steps are being taken in a case.” Pensions, Chambers & Partners 2018
“She pays excellent attention to detail and has great client care skills.” Pensions, Chambers & Partners 2018
“A tenacious advocate.” Pensions, Legal 500 2017
“She is clever, hardworking and knowledgeable.” Employment, Legal 500 2017
“She’s very thorough and user-friendly.” Pensions, Chambers & Partners 2017
“She’s very bright and super-reliable.” Pensions, Chambers & Partners 2017
“She is on top of her stuff, calm and confident in her advocacy and is unfazed in tribunal.” Employment, Chambers & Partners 2017
“She is very bright, very good with clients and very responsive.” Employment, Chambers & Partners 2017
“She has a robust and reassuring presence in court.” Pensions, Legal 500 2016
“She is always thoroughly prepared and instils confidence in clients through her knowledge of their case.” Employment, Legal 500 2016
“She is intellectually fearsome whilst also being personable and accessible – it’s a crucial mix at the modern Bar.”, “One of her big strengths is her ability to cut through a large amount of information to sift out what’s relevant.” Employment, Chambers & Partners 2015
“Very knowledgeable and always prepared to put in unsocial hours and days to get the job done.” Pensions, Chambers & Partners 2015
“She can think on her feet and is always meticulously prepared.” Employment, Legal 500 2015
“Highly regarded for entitlements and pensions negligence.” Pensions, Legal 500 2015
“She gets on very well with clients and is very good at tailoring her advice to suit the particular needs of the client.”, “She is very good at managing fact-heavy cases.” Employment, Chambers & Partners 2014
“Extremely diligent, clear and authoritative.” Pensions, Chambers & Partners 2014
“Achieves excellent results.” Employment, Legal 500 2014
Naomi Ling “Explains complex legislation in a way that is easy for clients to understand.” Pensions, Legal 500 2014
Naomi Ling is noted for her “very good judgement, and extremely thorough approach.” Employment, Legal 500 2013
Naomi Ling exhibits “great attention to detail, and is always prepared to put in the hours to get a job done.” Pensions, Legal 500 2013
Highlighted as a name to watch, Naomi Ling inspires “complete confidence.” Pensions, Chambers & Partners 2013
“Garnering praise is Naomi Ling, whom market observers applaud for her technical expertise in pensions work and strong client facing skills.” Pensions, Chambers & Partners 2012
Naomi Ling gives “very clear advice.” ” Pensions, Legal 500 2012
“Good response times and well thought-through advice.” Pensions, Chambers & Partners 2011
Naomi Ling is an “excellent junior who gets to the heart of the issue very quickly.” Pensions, Legal 500 2011
“Extremely effective and a star in the making.” Pensions Legal 500 2010